Introduction
Mental disorders are classified using standardized diagnostic systems that provide a common language for clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals worldwide. The two major classification systems are the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), developed by the American Psychiatric Association, and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), maintained by the World Health Organization.
Understanding these classification systems is crucial for nursing practice as they guide assessment, care planning, and evaluation. This resource provides a comprehensive overview of both systems, highlighting their structure, purpose, evolution, and clinical applications with a specific focus on nursing practice.
Nursing Focus
For nurses, these classification systems serve as essential tools for:
- Developing evidence-based care plans
- Communicating effectively with interdisciplinary teams
- Understanding the theoretical foundation for mental health interventions
- Documenting patient assessments and progress
- Facilitating insurance reimbursement and resource allocation
Historical Evolution
Both classification systems have evolved significantly over time in response to advances in scientific understanding, cultural shifts, and clinical needs.
1893
The International List of Causes of Death (predecessor to ICD) was first adopted
1952
First edition of DSM published, containing 106 mental disorders
1948
WHO takes responsibility for ICD and publishes ICD-6, which included mental disorders for the first time
1968
DSM-II published, aligned with ICD-8’s mental disorders section
1975
ICD-9 introduces significant updates to mental disorder classification
1980
DSM-III marks a major revision, introducing multiaxial system and explicit diagnostic criteria
1992
ICD-10 published, with Chapter V dedicated to mental and behavioral disorders
1994
DSM-IV released, maintaining multiaxial system and expanding diagnostic criteria
2018
ICD-11 adopted by World Health Assembly, with implementation beginning in 2022
2013
DSM-5 published, eliminating multiaxial system and adopting dimensional assessments
Key Point
Both classification systems have gradually shifted from categorizing disorders based primarily on symptom patterns and theoretical constructs to incorporating more empirical research, biological markers, and dimensional approaches to diagnosis.
DSM Overview
Full name: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Current edition: DSM-5 (Fifth Edition), with text revision (DSM-5-TR) released in 2022
Publisher: American Psychiatric Association (APA)
Primary use: The standard classification system for mental disorders in the United States, used by mental health professionals including psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, and nurses
Key Features:
- Detailed diagnostic criteria for each disorder
- Categorical approach with dimensional assessments
- Based on clinical consensus and research evidence
- Includes information on prevalence, development, risk factors, and diagnostic features
- Provides diagnostic codes compatible with ICD
DSM-5 Structure:
ICD Overview
Full name: International Classification of Diseases
Current edition: ICD-11 (implemented in 2022, though many countries still use ICD-10)
Publisher: World Health Organization (WHO)
Primary use: International standard for reporting diseases and health conditions, used globally for epidemiology, health management, and clinical purposes
Key Features:
- Comprehensive classification system for all health conditions
- Mental disorders are one chapter within a broader system
- Used for morbidity and mortality statistics worldwide
- Multilingual with cultural adaptations
- Standardized format for electronic health records
ICD-11 Mental Disorders Structure:
Evolution of DSM
The DSM has undergone significant transformations since its first publication, reflecting advances in psychiatric research, changes in conceptualization of mental disorders, and improvements in diagnostic reliability.
DSM-I (1952)
Psychodynamic focus; 106 disorders; reactions to life situations
DSM-II (1968)
Similar to DSM-I; 182 disorders; aligned with ICD-8
DSM-III (1980)
Major paradigm shift; multiaxial approach; explicit diagnostic criteria
DSM-IV (1994)
Refined criteria; enhanced empirical foundation; clinical significance criteria
DSM-5 (2013)
Eliminated multiaxial system; dimensional assessments; lifespan approach
Key Transitions in DSM-5
- Removal of the multiaxial system (Axes I-V)
- Introduction of dimensional assessments alongside categories
- Reorganization of disorders based on shared features and neurodevelopmental progression
- Addition of severity specifiers for many disorders
- Removal of “Not Otherwise Specified” in favor of “Other Specified” and “Unspecified” options
Nursing Application
Nurses should understand that DSM-5’s shift from a multiaxial system impacts documentation and assessment. While previous versions required separate notation of personality disorders and intellectual disabilities (Axis II), medical conditions (Axis III), psychosocial factors (Axis IV), and functioning (Axis V), DSM-5 integrates these elements into a more holistic diagnostic formulation.
DSM-5 vs. ICD-11: Key Differences
| Feature | DSM-5 | ICD-11 |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Primarily clinical diagnostic system for mental health professionals | General disease classification system with broader public health applications |
| Scope | Mental disorders only | All health conditions, with mental disorders as one chapter |
| Development | American Psychiatric Association | World Health Organization with international input |
| Cultural Perspective | Primarily Western/U.S. perspective with cultural formulations | International perspective with cultural adaptations |
| Diagnostic Approach | Detailed specific criteria for each disorder | More flexible clinical descriptions with essential features |
| Clinical Utility | Emphasis on reliability between clinicians | Greater emphasis on utility in global clinical settings |
| Coding | Uses ICD codes but with DSM-specific definitions | Original source of diagnostic codes used worldwide |
| Access | Proprietary publication (must be purchased) | Freely available online |
| Primary Use in Healthcare | Mental health specialty settings | Primary care and general medical settings globally |
Convergence Efforts
There have been significant efforts to harmonize DSM and ICD classifications. The DSM-5 development process involved coordination with ICD-11 workgroups, and both systems now share many structural similarities. However, important differences remain in diagnostic thresholds, disorder groupings, and conceptual approaches to certain conditions.
Diagnostic Process in Mental Health
Mental Health Diagnostic Process
Assessment Phase
- Comprehensive history taking
- Mental status examination
- Physical health assessment
- Psychometric testing
- Collateral information
- Risk assessment
Diagnostic Formulation
- Pattern recognition of symptoms
- Matching to DSM/ICD criteria
- Differential diagnosis
- Consideration of comorbidities
- Cultural formulation
- Severity assessment
Treatment Planning
- Evidence-based interventions
- Person-centered approaches
- Consideration of resources
- Multidisciplinary input
- Recovery orientation
- Outcome measurement
Continuous assessment and refinement
Nursing Role in the Diagnostic Process
Nurses play a vital role in the mental health diagnostic process through:
- Comprehensive biopsychosocial assessment
- Ongoing observation of behavioral patterns and symptoms
- Documentation of response to interventions
- Collaboration with interdisciplinary team members
- Patient and family education about diagnosis
- Monitoring for changes in symptoms that may suggest diagnostic revision
Clinical Application for Nurses
Assessment
- Use classification criteria as a framework for comprehensive assessment
- Document observed symptoms and behaviors that align with diagnostic criteria
- Consider developmental, cultural, and contextual factors that may influence symptom presentation
- Recognize patterns of comorbidity common among specific disorders
- Assess for severity specifiers to guide intervention intensity
Care Planning
- Align nursing interventions with evidence-based practices for specific diagnoses
- Develop nursing diagnoses that address specific symptoms and functional impacts
- Incorporate recovery-oriented goals based on diagnostic formulation
- Plan appropriate monitoring based on known risk factors for the diagnosis
- Consider interdisciplinary approaches specific to diagnostic categories
Implementation
- Implement psychoeducation about the specific disorder and treatment options
- Apply therapeutic communication strategies tailored to diagnostic considerations
- Administer and monitor medications indicated for specific disorders
- Facilitate appropriate therapy referrals based on diagnostic indications
- Implement safety measures based on risk factors associated with specific diagnoses
Evaluation
- Monitor for changes in diagnostic criteria over time
- Document response to interventions in relation to target symptoms
- Assess for emergence of new symptoms that may indicate comorbidity
- Evaluate functioning across domains affected by the disorder
- Contribute to diagnostic reformulation when clinical presentation changes
Diagnostic Limitations
While classification systems provide valuable structure, nurses should remain aware of their limitations:
- Diagnoses represent syndromes, not discrete disease entities
- Significant heterogeneity exists within diagnostic categories
- Comorbidity is the rule rather than the exception
- Cultural factors significantly influence symptom expression and interpretation
- Diagnostic labels may contribute to stigma if not used thoughtfully
Clinical Mnemonics
Mnemonics can help nurses remember key concepts related to mental disorder classification and diagnosis.
DIAGNOSE: Key Elements in Diagnostic Assessment
Duration
How long have the symptoms been present? Many disorders have minimum duration requirements.
Intensity
How severe are the symptoms? Consider using rating scales to quantify.
Associated features
What other symptoms or behaviors accompany the primary complaints?
Global functioning
How do symptoms impact work, relationships, self-care, and other domains?
Normal variation vs. pathology
Are symptoms outside the range of normal experiences in context and culture?
Onset and course
When and how did symptoms begin? Have they been continuous, worsening, or episodic?
Subjective distress
How bothered is the person by these symptoms?
Exclusions
Have medical conditions, substances, or other mental disorders been ruled out as causes?
RELIABLE: Principles for Using Classification Systems
Research-based
Understand that diagnostic criteria are based on research evidence.
Evolving
Recognize that classification systems change as knowledge advances.
Limitations
Be aware of the boundaries and shortcomings of diagnostic categories.
Individual differences
Consider that each person’s experience may vary within diagnostic categories.
Assessment tools
Use standardized measures to complement clinical judgment.
Biopsychosocial approach
Integrate biological, psychological, and social factors in assessment.
Longitudinal perspective
Consider symptoms over time, not just at a single assessment point.
Ethical use
Apply diagnoses to benefit patients, not to label or stigmatize.
Summary and Conclusion
Classification systems like the DSM and ICD provide essential frameworks for understanding, assessing, and treating mental disorders. These systems offer a common language that facilitates communication among healthcare professionals, guides evidence-based interventions, and supports research and education.
For nursing practice, these classification systems offer:
- A structured approach to assessment and documentation
- Guidance for developing evidence-based care plans
- A framework for patient education about mental health conditions
- A basis for interdisciplinary communication and collaboration
- Context for understanding treatment guidelines and protocols
While diagnostic classifications are invaluable tools, effective nursing care must always balance standardized approaches with person-centered, recovery-oriented principles. The individual’s unique experience, cultural context, personal strengths, and treatment preferences remain central to holistic nursing practice in mental health.
Key Takeaways
- DSM and ICD are complementary systems with different emphases and applications
- Both systems continue to evolve, reflecting advances in understanding of mental disorders
- Classification systems serve as guides to clinical practice, not rigid rulebooks
- Nursing assessment should consider diagnostic criteria within a holistic, person-centered framework
- Effective use of classification systems requires balancing standardization with individualization
Final Nursing Consideration
As nurses apply diagnostic classifications in practice, they should maintain a reflective, critical perspective. The categorization of human experiences into diagnostic entities is an evolving science with both strengths and limitations. Nursing’s holistic tradition offers a valuable counterbalance to potential reductionism, ensuring that while diagnoses inform care, the whole person—not just their diagnostic label—remains at the center of nursing practice.
References
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
- World Health Organization. (2019). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (11th ed.). https://icd.who.int/
- First, M. B. (2016). The importance of developmental field trials in the revision of psychiatric classifications. Lancet Psychiatry, 3(6), 579-584.
- Reed, G. M., First, M. B., Kogan, C. S., Hyman, S. E., Gureje, O., Gaebel, W., … & Saxena, S. (2019). Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 3-19.
- Halter, M. J. (2018). Varcarolis’ Foundations of Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing: A Clinical Approach (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
- Townsend, M. C., & Morgan, K. I. (2017). Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing: Concepts of Care in Evidence-Based Practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
- Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
- Stuart, G. W. (2019). Principles and Practice of Psychiatric Nursing (11th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Classification of Mental Disorders: ICD & DSM
Comprehensive nursing education notes on diagnostic systems
Created by Soumya Ranjan Parida for nursing education purposes
© 2025 All rights reserved